Second Quarter Recap & Outlook
July 2025
Investment grade credit had another solid quarter of performance during the second period. Credit spreads were volatile during the month of April before grinding tighter into May and throughout June.
Second Quarter Review
The second quarter was tumultuous for risk assets as the “Liberation Day” tariff announcement occurred early in the period on April 2nd. The tariff package went into effect just days later before a 90-day pause was announced on April 9th with an exception for China. Global equities plummeted and credit spreads drifted wider before both steadily retraced into quarter-end. During the second quarter, the option adjusted spread (OAS) on the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index tightened by 11 basis points to 83 after it began the quarter at a spread of 94. The spread on the index traded as wide as 119 in early April but IG credit was much better behaved than most other asset classes from a volatility perspective. Remarkably, even given the economic malaise as a result of US trade policy, lower quality BAA-rated IG credit slightly outperformed higher quality AAA & AA-rated credit through the first six months of the year. Intermediate maturities meaningfully outperformed longer duration maturities through the first six months. Shorter Treasury yields moved lower throughout the year but the 30yr bond yield remained elevated.
Year-to-date through quarter end, the 2yr-5yr-10yr Treasury yields had declined by 52, 58 and 34 basis points, respectively. Meanwhile, the 30yr Treasury closed above 5% several times in late May before moving lower in June and finishing the month at 4.77%. Through the end of the second quarter, the 30yr was within less than a full basis point of where it began 2025. One thought as to why intermediate rates have moved lower while the 30yr has been stagnant is that the long end of the Treasury market is driven much more by the outlook for fiscal and monetary policy as well as inflation expectations.
With credit spreads inside of historical averages, coupon income remained an important driver of investor returns through the first six months of the year. Coupon income accounted for 2.32% of the Corporate Index year-to-date total return through June 30th, while price appreciation accounted for 1.81% and other factors contributed 0.04%.
Taking credit spreads and Treasury yields together, the yield to worst on the corporate index finished the quarter at 5% relative to its 10yr average of 3.78%. Credit spreads finished the quarter with an index spread of 83 compared to the 10yr average of 119. While credit spreads look somewhat snug, we believe that this is a classical “buy the yield, not the spread” environment for investors and we continue to believe that investment grade credit offers compelling risk reward for its credit quality and duration.
The Power of Diversification
The volatility of the second quarter provided an excellent example of the usefulness of investment grade credit as a diversifier in asset allocation. Diversification is not necessarily about increasing returns but rather reducing risk and maximizing growth potential over a longer time horizon. One measure of downside protection is “drawdown” which is the return calculated as the percentage decline in value from the previous peak to the subsequent trough. We examined YTD daily returns for a variety of asset classes through the first six months of 2025.
There has been a retracement in all of the above asset classes, but when the news cycle was at its worst and investor fears were at their peak, the impact on investment grade credit was relatively limited compared to riskier assets. It remains to be seen if this retracement is overdone, as the impact of US trade policy on the global economy may not yet have been fully realized. Investment grade corporate bonds have historically produced returns that have limited drawdown while providing advantageous risk adjusted returns during periods of uncertainty.
FOMC Holding Steady (For Now)
The FOMC met twice during the second quarter, in May and June and elected to hold its policy rate steady both times, a continuation of the pattern that has been in place for all four of 2025’s meetings. Four meetings remain this year: July 30, September 17, October 29 and December 10. Although the consensus view of investors is that there will not be a cut at the July meeting, Chairman Powell declined to rule it out at a central bank gathering in Portugal on July 1st. On July 3rd, nonfarm payrolls for the month of June posted a solid beat relative to expectations and the unemployment rate fell. This likely closed the door on the possibility of a July cut. Instead, investors have coalesced around the likelihood of the first cut of the year occurring at the September meeting with Fed Funds Futures pricing a 92.3% probability of a cut at quarter end with those expectations falling to an 68.1% chance on July 3rd after the June payroll report.
At the end of the second quarter futures were pricing -67bps worth of cumulative cuts before the end of 2025. The FOMC took a slightly more hawkish view with the most recent release of the Summary of Economic Projections (dot plot) on June 18th. The Fed dots showed that the median FOMC member was expecting -50bps of cuts in 2025 with one additional -25bp cut in 2026. Investors were meaningfully more dovish than the Fed at quarter end with futures pricing -135bp of cuts through the end of 2026. This translates to 5.4 25bp cuts versus the FOMC median outlook for 3 25bp cuts.
We continue to expect 1-2 cuts in 2025. The labor market has been gradually cooling for some time but it has not shown signs of serious deterioration just yet. If it gets to that point in the cycle then that is when there is more potential for a flurry of cuts from the FOMC as they would likely move quickly to stabilize the economy.
Sentiment Can Change Quickly
With the potential for policy cuts looming on the horizon, the opportunity to invest at elevated yields could be fleeting. When we look back to April, it was rather shocking how swiftly equity markets turned on a dime. Volatility could surge again in the absence of a series of trade deals. Geopolitical issues remain at the forefront in Europe and the Middle East. We will continue to position the portfolio conservatively, with a preference for stable credits that can generate cash during uncertain economic times. Thank you for the trust that you have placed in us.
In the adjacent table you will find portfolio statistics that are representative of a new account for each of our investment strategies. Please contact us with any questions.
This information is intended solely to report on investment strategies identified by Cincinnati Asset Management. Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Gross of advisory fee performance does not reflect the deduction of investment advisory fees. Our advisory fees are disclosed in Form ADV Part 2A. Accounts managed through brokerage firm programs usually will include additional fees. Returns are calculated monthly in U.S. dollars and include reinvestment of dividends and interest. The Index is unmanaged and does not take into account fees, expenses, and transaction costs. Index returns and related data such as yields and spreads are shown for comparative purposes and is based on information generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable. No representation is made to its accuracy or completeness.
The information provided in this report should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will either be suitable or profitable for a client’s portfolio. Fixed income investments have varying degrees of credit risk, interest rate risk, default risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein have been held or will be held in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed do not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings, if any. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions or holdings discussed were or will prove to be profitable, or that the investment decisions we make in the future will be profitable or will equal the investment performance of the securities discussed herein. Upon request, Cincinnati Asset Management will furnish a list of all security recommendations made within the past year.
Additional disclosures on the material risks and potential benefits of investing in corporate bonds are available on our website: https://www.cambonds.com/disclosure-statements/.